Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Lah v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10008
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Lah, Jr., Joseph F. Lah, Jr. and Joseph F. Lah, Jr.
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc., Cameron International Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Echols v. General Motors Corporation
as 1:2008cv01732
Plaintiff:
Reuben A. Echols
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Compos v. Cuellar et al
as 3:2008cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mary Compos
Defendant:
Belen Cuellar and General Motors Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nichols v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00591
Plaintiff:
Carl Nichols and Carl Nichols
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, General Motors Corporation via their statutory agent: CT Corporation, Fidelity Investments and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lanham v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv10000
Plaintiff:
Duane Lanham, Duane Lanham, Linda Lanham and others
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation, General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Filing Error
as 1:2008cv00385
Plaintiff:
Duane Lanham
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation, General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
