Cases 11 - 20 of 1,318
Ferguson v. BlendedTraditions Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Ferguson
Defendant:
BlendedTraditions Inc. and Tasha N. Harris
Merrick v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65177
Plaintiff:
Ryan N. Merrick
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Latreese N. Hines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Filing Error
as 1:2024sf65074
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Doris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doris v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65075
Plaintiff:
Danielle N Doris and Danielle N. Doris
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirchbaum v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Dreamana N Kirchbaum and Dreamana N. Kirchbaum
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Danyell N. Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lore N. Cooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
