Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Prince George's County Maryland v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45501
Plaintiff:
Prince George's County Maryland
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prince v. Cosgrove et al
as 5:2018cv00533
Plaintiff:
Melvin Prince, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia A. Cosgrove, Jay A. Cole, Carla Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy-Bey v. Los Angeles Unified School District
as 1:2016cv01144
Plaintiff:
Prince Sahaali A.M. Kennedy-Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy-Bey v. Los Angeles Unified School District
as 1:2016cv00889
Plaintiff:
Prince Sahaali A.M. Kennedy-Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kennedy-Bey v. Los Angeles Unified School District
as 1:2016cv00890
Plaintiff:
Prince Sahaali A.M. Kennedy-Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotten v. Lazaroff
as 1:2015cv00854
Plaintiff:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr.
Defendant:
Alan J Lazaroff, Tom Bond, D. Minard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotten v. Lazaroff
as 1:2015cv00856
Petitioner:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr.
Respondent:
Alan J. Lazaroff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
International Watchman, Inc. v. Debeer Watch Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02358
Plaintiff:
International Watchman, Inc.
Defendant:
Debeer Watch Brands, Inc., Panatime Corporation, DaLuca Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01760
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cotten vs Turner
as 3:2013cv01067
Petitioner:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr.
Respondent:
Neil Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
