Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Jones v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65349
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jones
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Flenner v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv02292
Petitioner:
Cecil Lee Flenner
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartman v. Sackler et al
as 1:2021op45117
Plaintiff:
Paul Hartman
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Sackler, David Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt and others
Price v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01493
Plaintiff:
Cecil Price
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lathan et al v. Rutter et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darek Lathan, Kelley Lee, Richard Stewart and others
Defendant:
John Tharp, Alex Rutter, Dennis Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Little v. Sheldon
as 3:2020cv02527
Petitioner:
Cecil Little
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coos County et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46136
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mark Timney, Michael P. Dipre and others
Plaintiff:
Coos County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll County v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46137
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mark Timney, Michael P. Dipre and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rotnem v. USA
as 5:2019cv02793
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cecil J. Rotnem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019op45264
Plaintiff:
Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL, Logan County Board of Commissioners, OH and others
Defendant:
Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Theresa Sackler and others
Petitioner:
Town of Swampscott, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
