Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pressler-Kemper v. Daniels
as 3:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Sophia S. Pressler-Kemper
Defendant:
Carson H. Daniels and Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pressler-Kemper v. Gates et al
as 3:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
Sophia S. Pressler-Kemper
Defendant:
Carson P Gates, Applegate, Inc., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Cross Claimant:
Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kemper County, MS v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op45870
Defendant:
TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinkrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kemper County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goldie v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company
as 1:2002cv01529
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Goldie
Defendant:
Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
