Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals, et al.
as 4:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals, Northeast Ohio Correction Center, Paul E. Bonanno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65259
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Marshall
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing v. Singh
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Marshall Goldman Motor Sales & Leasing doing business as iBuy Luxury Cars
Defendant:
Navdeep Singh and Amandeep Kaur
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Juanito Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Shapiro et al.
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Clarence Robert Rankin
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Xavior Becerra, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Toledo Police Department
as 3:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Toledo Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 4:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
