Cases 121 - 130 of 4,806
Rohrig v. DHL International GMBH et al
as 2:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rohrig
Defendant:
DHL International GMBH and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Doe v. The Christ Hospital
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Christ Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Doe v. The Christ Hospital
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Christ Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Henderson v. Schugel
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert G Henderson
Defendant:
JR Schugel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Davis, Jr. v. Farrish et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Theodore W. Davis and Theodore W. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Farrish and Rolfes Henry CO., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Alford v. Beechmont II Leasing Co., LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Casey Alford
Defendant:
Beechmont II Leasing Co., LLC doing business as Harrison Healthcare Center, Communicare, Inc., Communicare Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shuttleworth v. Wal-Mart Inc.
as 3:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Holly Shuttleworth
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc. and Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Riley v. Home Depot, USA Inc.
as 1:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darren Riley
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. and Home Depot, USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Henderson v. Saddle Creek Transportation
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robert G Henderson
Defendant:
Saddle Creek Transportation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Barrett-Peters v. Wal-Mart Inc.
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Tanya Barrett-Peters
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
