Cases 41 - 50 of 374
Owens v. Jameson et al
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens, r
Defendant:
Michael Jameson, Willis Law Firm LLC and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Aviles et al v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Eileen Aviles, Shelby Cooper, Tanya Cooper and others
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Reese Lyle
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Canaday v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Haley Canaday
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Toporek v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
Michael Toporek
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Leyva et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
Angela Leyva and Andrea Fahey
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bryski v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
Tova Bryski and Miriam Amselem
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Blake v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Beth Blake
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley et al v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KELLEY, JEREMY WILSON, DANTE MELENDEZ and others
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pickens et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Gregory Pickens and Ryan Rinz
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
