Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sealy v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Dessalines Sealy
Respondent:
The United States of America, Ebonoluwa A. Taiwo, Timothy S. Mungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J.O.B. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
J.O.B. and Jamus Oran Bryant
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank Kendall III, Capt. Stacy Michelle Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crawmer v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Stefan Chadwick Crawmer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. United States Of America
as 2:2021cv00050
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00145
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Moore, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alford v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00412
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Alford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00304
Petitioner:
Dwaine Wright
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rhodes v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00202
Petitioner:
Ronell S Rhodes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aliane v. Warden, Franklin County Corrections Center I
as 2:2016cv00146
Petitioner:
Malek Bouzid Aliane
Respondent:
Warden, Franklin County Corrections Center I
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
