Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Vanhorn v. Monroe County Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05470
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Vanhorn
Defendant:
Monroe County Ohio, Sheriff Charles Black, Jr., Major Shipp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapple, Jr. v. Unknown Officers et al
as 2:2021cv05086
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Chapple, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, Chaplin Chambers, Captain Vincent Brammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Muskingum County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv04987
Plaintiff:
Dustin Edwin Barker, DeAngelo Dewon Tellis, Jamie Lee Mayle and others
Defendant:
Muskingum County Jail, Muskingum County Sheriff's Office, Muskingum County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Butler, et al
as 2:2021cv00774
Defendant:
Patterson, Lt Ross, Officer Stout and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmeyer v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Aramark Inc., Sergeant Hillis, Captain Frisby and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Major Galloway, Joshua Gullett, Linnea Mahlman and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Erdos et al
as 1:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Major Galloway, Captain Frazie, Ronald Erdos and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Mohr et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Distel, John Doe, Correctional Officer Kyle and others
Plaintiff:
Algernon Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman et al v. Burghy et al
as 2:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Captain Burghy, Officer Cowgill, Officer Sheppard and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Coleman and J'Kuan Maleek Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
