Drug Related Seizure of Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 101 - 110 of 263
United States of America v. 3982.00 in U.S. Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00379
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 3982.00 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 1265 Prospect Place, Cincinnati, Ohio, Real Property Located at et al
as 1:2011cv00755
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 1265 Prospect Place, Cincinnati, Ohio, Real Property Located at, 1915 Adams Road, Cincinnati, Ohio, Real Property Located at, 9747 Stadia Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, Real Property Located at and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $6,000.00 (Six Thousand Dollars) in United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00692
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $6,000.00 (Six Thousand Dollars) in United States Currency and $55,060.00 (Fifty-Five Thousand Sixty Dollars) in United States Currency
Claimant: Ryan Egozi
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventeen and 47/100 Dollars ($30,717.47) in United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00735
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred Seventeen and 47/100 Dollars ($30,717.47) in United States Currency , A 2003 Hummer, H-2, A 2008 Chevrolet Corvette and others
Claimant: Delaino Garland
Movant: Samuel Cavin and U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2007 Cadillac DTS, VIN 1G6K057Y57U214610 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00264
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2007 Cadillac DTS, VIN 1G6K057Y57U214610 and 2004 Dodge Durango, VIN 1D8HB58D14F118029
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Ninety-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Two and 00/100 Dollars ($98,942.00) in United States Currency
as 2:2011cv00617
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ninety-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Two and 00/100 Dollars ($98,942.00) in United States Currency
Claimant: Juan Carlos Torres
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,500.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,500.00) in United States Currency and 13 Firearms with Assorted Ammunition
Movant: Tracy Katz and Walter M Pasco
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One Million Two Hundred Eight-Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($1,282,360.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00570
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Million Two Hundred Eight-Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($1,282,360.00) in United States Currency, Two (2) JP Morgan Chase Bank Cashier's Checks Totalling Fifty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Sixty-Six and 32/100 Dollars ($52,466.32), Ninteen (19) Assorted Money Orders, Totaling Sixteen Thousand Four Hundred Sixty and 00/100 Dollars ($16,460.00) and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. A 2010 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN 2G1FT1EW3A9160233, Record Owner Jessica Litzy et al
as 2:2011cv00392
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: A 2010 Chevrolet Camaro, VIN 2G1FT1EW3A9160233, Record Owner Jessica Litzy
Claimant: Anthony Johnson and Jessica Litzy
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2007 Dodge Charger VIN 2B3KA43R87H696721 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00146
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2007 Dodge Charger VIN 2B3KA43R87H696721 and 2600.00 U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?