Cases 171 - 180 of 7,371
Henderson v. Village of New Holland et al
as 2:2023cv03979
Plaintiff:
Cody Henderson
Defendant:
Village of New Holland, William Lawless and Darnell Pate, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosales v. USA
as 3:2023cv00354
Petitioner:
Jason Rosales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wood v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03275
Petitioner:
Scott Wood
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Higgins v. USA
as 3:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Brian Higgins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sutton v. USA
as 1:2023cv00765
Petitioner:
Randall Sutton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gama-Perez v. Brown
as 2:2023cv03818
Petitioner:
Josue Gama-Perez
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ashford v. State Of Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Charles Vincent Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, City of Dayton, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03356
Petitioner:
Mark A Hill
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitacre v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03077
Petitioner:
Carl E Whitacre
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Brown
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
