Cases 21 - 30 of 7,384
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heath v. USA
as 1:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Dion Heath
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wallace v. Olabode et al
as 2:2024cv02755
Plaintiff:
William Edward Harley Wallace
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Olabode, Kelle Gapen, Jim Hildreth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shade v. Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
as 2:2024cv02694
Petitioner:
O'Bryan Shade
Respondent:
Warden Franklin County Corrections Center II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Smith v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Gerald K Smith
Defendant:
D. Hogan, Warden Norman Robinson, Stanley Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00288
Petitioner:
Markeith Ford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Marcum v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
as 2:2024cv02645
Petitioner:
Jennifer L Marcum
Respondent:
Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Titus v. Davis
as 2:2024cv02641
Petitioner:
Timothy Titus
Respondent:
Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
