Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Markwell v. Fleego et al
as 2:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Alan H. Markwell
Defendant:
Mark C. Fleego, Robert L. Smith and Kevin VanHorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2018cv00183
Petitioner:
Stephen H. Whitt
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hertel v. Krueger et al
as 2:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Frank K.C. Hertel, Sr
Defendant:
Everett H Krueger, Craig R. Baldwin, William B. Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juan v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 2:2017cv01056
Petitioner:
Hector A. H. Juan
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00490
Petitioner:
Charles H Nguyen
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Charles H Nguyen
Defendant:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2017oe00467
Plaintiff:
Charles H Nguyen
Defendant:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juarez v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2017cv00366
Petitioner:
Oscar H. Juarez
Defendant:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 2:2017cv00424
Petitioner:
William H. Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mason v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Mason
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Missy Roush, Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
