Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Wright v. Allen et al
as 1:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
Nadine Allen, Richard A Niehaus, Sherry L. Poland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. USA
as 3:2016cv00280
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Neil Allen McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gerth v. Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
as 1:2016cv00598
Petitioner:
Mark Gerth
Respondent:
Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bethel v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2015cv03016
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Bethel
Defendant:
Charlotte Jenkins and Michael Allen Eiring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sheldon
as 2:2015cv02971
Petitioner:
Anthony S Davis
Respondent:
Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02935
Petitioner:
Anthony S Davis
Respondent:
Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02931
Petitioner:
Anthony S Davis
Respondent:
Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Christian Separatist Church Society of Ohio; The Wife of Christ, Prosopopoeia et al v. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02757
Plaintiff:
The Christian Separatist Church Society of Ohio; The Wife of Christ, Prosopopoeia, Ray S. Heid, Raymond R. Wolf, II and others
Defendant:
The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Gary C Mohr, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dingess v. Allen et al
as 2:2015cv02611
Plaintiff:
George L. Dingess, Sr.
Defendant:
Dennis Allen, Snider and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
