Cases 41 - 50 of 7,359
Reese v. Holbrook
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Destin Dezwyn Reese
Defendant:
Judge Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutherford v. Free et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Clinton Rutherford
Defendant:
Corby Free, Ashley Marsh, Lt. Jhones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Holmes v. Glaser et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Brian Isiah Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela J. Glaser, Maria Christine Palermo and Michelle Agresta Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carver v. Warden, Allen Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
James Edward Carver
Respondent:
Warden, Allen Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larr v. Mackey
as 2:2024cv01730
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Henderson v. McCabe et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Delaquan D. Henderson
Defendant:
McCabe, Leana Witdress and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Neal
Respondent:
Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
