Cases 71 - 80 of 7,359
Penland v. Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Defendant:
Lieutenant Flowers, Matthew Johnson, Zachary Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Manns et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer T Manns, Officer Halib Kahn, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitts v. Gear et al
as 2:2024cv01391
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D. Fitts
Defendant:
Officer Gear and Lieutenant Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eckstein v. Carter
as 2:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Blake Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Huffman v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
David Warren Huffman
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Eckstein
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith and Jennifer Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. USA
as 2:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Porter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
