Cases 1 - 10 of 70
GARRISON v. HAWKINS et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Petitioner:
Carlos Q Garrison
Respondent:
DANIEL HAWKINS, MICHAEL RUCKER, MATTHEW J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alward v. Newell et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Brian Newell, Warden Healey, Elkton FSL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassone v. D'Varga et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tassone
Defendant:
Judge Jessica G D'Varga and Judge James Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Braunskill v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ralphiell Braunskill
Defendant:
Agent Danielle Smith, Clermont Co. Sheriff Dept., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penland v. Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Alex Penland
Defendant:
Lieutenant Flowers, Matthew Johnson, Zachary Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Phillips et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ash
Defendant:
Robert Phillips, III, Dustin Hardway, Kevin Fairfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caupp v. Parin
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Parin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elliott v. Stevens
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Elliott
Defendant:
Bobbie J. Stevens, Sgt. Bryan Barney, Venrot Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Yost et al
as 2:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Seain C. Hull
Defendant:
David Yost, Matthew Crall, Scott Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caupp v. Hawes
as 3:2023cv00309
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Hawes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
