Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bogle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Crawford P. Bogle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. Dezarn et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas R. Dezarn P0002 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department, Officer William P. Goetz P0100 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department, Officer Myles J. ABT P0076 doing business as Cincinnati Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler v. Browning
as 2:2022cv03523
Plaintiff:
Jason P. Fowler
Defendant:
Case Manager Michael C. Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv02466
Petitioner:
Joshua P Estes
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
Joshua P Estes
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Folley v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Derek Folley
Defendant:
Barbara P Gorman, Mr. Jonathan W. Sauline, Jr., Mathias H Heck, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Wiedman et al
as 2:2021cv01876
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Darci Moore, Matthew Wiedman, David Andy Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. USA
as 2:2021cv01516
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shawn P. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
