Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ferguson v. May
as 2:2023cv01540
Petitioner:
Jared T. Ferguson
Respondent:
Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldwire v. Smith-Chambers et al
as 2:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Goldwire
Defendant:
Mrs. Cleveland, Marva Allen, Alexander Kostenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. USA
as 2:2017cv00983
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenitha L. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02448
Petitioner:
Kevin Ferguson
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Lyon, Polly Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 2:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Polly Schmalz, Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
James Mobley
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Gary C Mohr, Gary R. Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv00752
Petitioner:
Geoffrey K. Ferguson
Respondent:
Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
