Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Adams, et al v. Ohio Neighborhood Finance, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv00947
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Adams and Jesse Adams
Defendant:
Ohio Neighborhood Finance, Inc., Cashland Financial Services, Inc., Cash America International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Williams v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Inc. and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Posel v. Dayton Power & Light et al.
as 1:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
John M Posel
Defendant:
Dayton Power & Light, Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., Mid Atlantic Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Randolph v. Holzer Medical Center et al
as 2:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Paul C Randolph and Paul C Randolph
Defendant:
Holzer Medical Center, Holzer Clinic, Inc., Holzer Consolidated Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
