Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04326
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02691
Plaintiff:
Herbert G. Newton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02647
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv05414
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shane Newton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Newton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robin R Newton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Newton Asphalt Paving, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00771
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Newton Asphalt Paving, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United States of America v. Aberle et al
as 1:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard S. Aberle, Lanae A. Aberle, Lincoln National Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Newton v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.,
as 2:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
Ronald Newton
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
