Cases 21 - 30 of 403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sousa v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sousa
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demarco v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02599
Plaintiff:
Phillip Demarco
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
Phillips Sams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
Leigh J. Phillips
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ausmus v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ausmus
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC v. O'Hara et al
as 1:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
CRUSA Cincinnati, LLC
Defendant:
Randy M. O'Hara, SERVPRO OF CAMPBELL COUNTY, SERVPRO OF ANDERSON, FRANKLIN & SCOTT COUNTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Phillips v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
