Cases 31 - 40 of 138
Cross v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02849
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Errick Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sapphire Crossing LLC v. London Computer Systems, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00407
Defendant:
London Computer Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Crossing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Dumas v. Albaier et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
2141218 Alberta LTD d/b/a Splendour Trucking LTD., Barr-Nunn Transportation, LLC, Brandon Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Dumas
Cross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02490
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Pauline Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02145
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Cross
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Cross et al
as 2:2020oe02144
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc. and Nathaniel Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Cross et al
as 2:2020cv02144
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc. and Nathaniel Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RiverCity Properties, LLC et al v. The City of Belpre, Ohio et al
as 2:2020cv00530
Plaintiff:
RiverCity Properties, LLC and Ron Eddy Builders, Ltd.
Defendant:
Safety-Service Dir. Ronald D. Cross and The City of Belpre, Ohio
Not Classified By Court:
Peter K Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus East, Inc. v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2019cv05594
Defendant:
Desire Foreman, Desire Freeman, Premera Blue Cross and others
Plaintiff:
Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus East, Inc. v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Plaintiff:
Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus East, Inc.
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross, Garrett Darryl, Anthem Insurance Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
