Cases 41 - 50 of 556
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delong v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02748
Plaintiff:
Andrew Delong
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown, Sr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02470
Defendant:
Andrew Brown, Sr, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Faul v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02683
Plaintiff:
Andrew Faul
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02349
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Miller and Lori Beth Miller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mathis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Colston v. Eddy
as 2:2023cv01599
Plaintiff:
Spencer Colston
Defendant:
Andrew Eddy, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Essinger v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
as 2:2023cv01800
Plaintiff:
Andrew Essinger
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and David Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straughter v. Eddy et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Valdez J. Straughter
Defendant:
Dr Andrew Eddy, Karen Stanforth, Jenny Hildebrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CDK Global, LLC v. Tekion Corp et al
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
CDK Global, LLC
Defendant:
TEKION CORP, Andrew Backs, Demi Auel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
