Cases 41 - 50 of 513
Choina et al v. Ohio Department of Taxation et al
as 2:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Choina and Jane A Choina
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Taxation and John J Saxon, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller, Sr. v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03232
Plaintiff:
Phillip Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Donald White, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tedder et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02897
Plaintiff:
Charles Tedder, Sr. and Kristina Tedder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cazares v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02899
Plaintiff:
John Cazares, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miceli v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02869
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Miceli, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ronald Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox, Sr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cox, Sr. and Susan Cox
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
