Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Brisbin v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03959
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brisbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byrd v. City of Forest Park et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Defendant:
City of Forest Park, Forest Park Police Department and Officers John Does 1-6
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stratton v. Highland County et al
as 2:2024cv03868
Defendant:
Anneka Collins, Donald Barrerra and Ohio Highland County
Plaintiff:
Brandon Stratton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stratton v. Highland County et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Defendant:
Anneka Collins, Donald Barrerra and Highland County
Plaintiff:
Brandon Stratton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Leigh v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Brandon W. Leigh
Defendant:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peebler v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03301
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Peebler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pierce v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02778
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pierce
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deible v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Brandon Deible
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weston v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. Weston
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
