Cases 1 - 10 of 156
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, David F. Zeyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pidde v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Eugene Pidde
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harkey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02981
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harkey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bland v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02625
Plaintiff:
Eugene Bland
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Truppa v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Eugene Truppa, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Eugene Charles Adler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Ted Eugene Wilson and Patricia Wilson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Vallis Eugene Stephen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00204
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
John Maurice Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hebert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hebert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
