Cases 1 - 10 of 707
Hardwick v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Hardwick
Defendant:
3M Company, EIDP, INC. fka E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Norman v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
April Norman
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Art Dahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lattea v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lattea
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bradley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hubbell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hubbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brauss v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02560
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brauss
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Munyan v. Oswalt et al
as 2:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
James M. Munyan
Defendant:
Kenneth Oswalt, Timothy Bubb, Duane Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kiener et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02281
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kiener and Jennifer Kiener
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeMarke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00082
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick DeMarke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Prestwich v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prestwich
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
