Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walls v. Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff:
Shawn Walls
Defendant:
Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walls v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Dianne Walls
Defendant:
DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wall v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Brandon W Wall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wall et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wall and Billie Wall
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wall v. Empowering Columbus LLC et al
as 2:2021cv05828
Plaintiff:
Mark Wall
Defendant:
Empowering Columbus LLC, I&S Builders LLC, Offir Sharabi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wall et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04323
Plaintiff:
LEAH WHITE WALL and MATTHEW STONE
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walls v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Valeri Walls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Walls
as 2:2020cv06176
Defendant:
Daniel Vance Walls and Daniel V. Walls
Plaintiff:
United States Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
