Cases 121 - 130 of 2,008
Hughes v. City of Wagoner et al
as 6:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
De'Aundre Hughes
Defendant:
City of Wagoner, Ty Wooton and Clarence Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudle v. USA
as 6:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Wendell Ray Caudle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fish v. Bennet
as 6:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Brandis N. Fish
Respondent:
Bennet and Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritesman v. Summers
as 6:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ron Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Chris Hauger, Julie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meza v. Quick et al
as 6:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Miguel Meza
Defendant:
Christey Quick, Terri Apala and James Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenton Busby
Defendant:
The State of Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Lance A. Dennis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
