Cases 161 - 170 of 2,008
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Magness v. Pettigrew
as 6:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Michael D. Magness
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Harp
as 6:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Tyrone Jerrell Moore
Respondent:
Steven Harp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Chennault et al
as 6:2022cv00369
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation, Jason Chennault and Sara Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evitt v. Harp
as 6:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Carinzo Jaron Evitt
Respondent:
Steven Harp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harding v. Core Civic Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
William L. Harding
Defendant:
Core Civic Corrections, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Cpt. Ellars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pemberton v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00025
Petitioner:
Paul Curtis Pemberton
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Titsworth v. Harpe
as 6:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Keith Bruno Titsworth
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bray v. Christian et al
as 6:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jeromy D. Bray
Defendant:
John Christian and City Tele Coin Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.