Cases 171 - 180 of 2,008
Titsworth v. Harpe
as 6:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Keith Bruno Titsworth
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vannortwick v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00357
Petitioner:
Kyle Joseph Vannortwick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Richardson v. Philpott et al
as 6:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kerry Cohee Richardson
Defendant:
Nolan Philpott, Christopher Rochell and Muskogee Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedgpeth v. Pettigrew
as 6:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Gary Hedgpeth
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Elliott
as 6:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Cordareau Nicario Jackson
Respondent:
District Court of Wagoner County and Chris Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tyler v. Dallas et al
as 6:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Aaron Zane Tyler
Defendant:
Johnny Dallas, T.J. Girdner, Mary Burlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Veech et al
as 6:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Frank Veech, Sgt. JoJo Thornton and Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Elliott
as 6:2022cv00363
Petitioner:
Cordareau Nicario Jackson
Respondent:
Wagoner County Detention Center and Chris Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parks v. Fritcher et al
as 6:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Defendant:
Eric Fritcher and Tara Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
