Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Gray v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Randy L. Gray
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braden v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Shane Braden
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henson v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00037
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Nunn, Scott Crow and others
Petitioner:
Tommie D. Henson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aubertin v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Maurice Aubertin
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Anastacio Perez, Michael Moriarity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
Mario Williams
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Secretary of Interior, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00027
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
John H. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Musick v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00026
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Musick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckardt v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00025
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John M. O and others
Petitioner:
Kyle R. Eckardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chilton v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00014
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Charles P. Chilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00015
Respondent:
O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Omer Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
