Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Hand et al
as 6:2011cv00345
Plaintiff:
John H. May
Defendant:
Joyand Hand, Ronald Anderson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. IHCC, et al.,
as 6:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gray
Defendant:
IHCC D&E Unit 1 Doc and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Tiger et al
as 6:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Gary Wallace
Defendant:
Ryan Tiger and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Earl Beard
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
David Earl Beard, John Sanders and Department of Correction Inmates being housed in the Pontotoc County Jail
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Parker et al
as 6:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
T. K. Benson
Defendant:
Ron Parker and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 6:2010cv00071
Petitioner:
John T. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jemaine Monteil Cannon
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections, Randall G. Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Howard et al
as 6:2009cv00481
Petitioner:
Peter James Robinson
Respondent:
Bruce Howard and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
