Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bechtol v. Carter County et al
as 6:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edward Bechtol
Defendant:
Carter County, Chris Bryant, Harvey Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings, Jr. v. Carter et al
as 6:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Donnie Edward Jennings, Jr.
Defendant:
Dan Carter, Ron Summers, Colby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Labansat v. Bryant
as 6:2021cv00360
Petitioner:
Richard Labansat
Respondent:
Carter County, Carter County, OK and Chris Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brena v. M. Johnson, et al
as 6:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriff Department, Joe Doe, Sgt. Coffee and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Brena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Farris
as 6:2019cv00243
Petitioner:
Robert D. Carter
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zeleny v. Chris Bryant et al
as 6:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Kyle Coffey, Brad Dunning, Chris Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Avery Nelson Zeleny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Cronister et al
as 6:2019cv00058
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Cronister and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryman v. Baldwin et al
as 6:2018cv00107
Plaintiff:
Lionel A. Berryman
Defendant:
Thomas K. Baldwin, Heather Cooper, Ryan Hunnicutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC et al
as 6:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Locke
Defendant:
Medical Director of Correctional Health DOC, Carter, Medical Director W.P. Clements Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
