Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Palmer v. Farrow
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David M. Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cys v. Cook et al
as 6:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Cys
Defendant:
FNU Cook, Dr. Patchin and FNU Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Cole
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Amanda Windell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Schrum et al
as 6:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Chris Schrum, Johnny Dallis, Sylvia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Buss
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Thomas Jesse Ward
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Chris Hauger, Julie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
