Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,079
Harmon v. Biden et al
as 6:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Clark Harmon
Defendant: Joe Biden, Merrick B. Garland, Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company v. Pharr et al
as 6:2024cv00202
Plaintiff: Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Renee Pharr and Luke Pharr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
Smith-Shuman v. Beare
as 6:2024cv00201
Plaintiff: Alice M. Smith-Shuman
Defendant: Mindy M Beare
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Buckner v. Sequoyah County
as 6:2024cv00200
Plaintiff: Dwayne Eddy Buckner
Defendant: Sequoyah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff: Amy Hill
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Manning v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Patrick Manning, II
Defendant: C.O. Jordan and Warden Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Teresa A. Cobb
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: Robert Allen
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gavit v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Teresa Gavit
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brizendine v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00195
Plaintiff: Christopher S. Brizendine
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?