Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Large v. Beckham County et al
as 6:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Charlse Large
Defendant:
Beckham County, State of Oklahoma, Beckham County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Miller et al
as 6:2013cv00091
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Griffin
Respondent:
Chad Miller and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmidt v. Dowling et al
as 6:2012cv00462
Petitioner:
Paul David Schmidt
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hess v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hess
Defendant:
Justin Jones, State of Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Rogers County, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Smith et al
as 6:2012cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lynch
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Smith and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2012cv00325
Petitioner:
Steven R. Hargrove
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hess v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00313
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Hess
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Rogers County, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Sirmons et al
as 6:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Green
Defendant:
Marty Sirmons, Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
