Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Farrar v. Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
as 6:2015cv00164
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Farrar
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webb v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Miller et al
as 6:2013cv00091
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Griffin
Respondent:
Chad Miller and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmidt v. Dowling et al
as 6:2012cv00462
Petitioner:
Paul David Schmidt
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Sirmons et al
as 6:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Green
Defendant:
Marty Sirmons, Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doherty v. Mullin et al
as 6:2012cv00171
Petitioner:
Aaron Doherty
Respondent:
Mike Mullin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00055
Petitioner:
Danny R Dawkins
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womack v. Chester et al
as 6:2011cv00372
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Respondent:
C. Chester and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00117
Petitioner:
Tommy Davis
Respondent:
Randall G. Workman and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
