Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Johnson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00463
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Ricky Adams, Mark Tschetter and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wickham v. Gibson et al
as 4:2018cv00449
Defendant:
Curtis Barnes, Carl Gibson, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickham et al v. Gibson et al
as 4:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Terry Allen Wickham, Carl Gibson, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Dean Wickham and Paul Leroy Wickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Issa v. Department of Human Services Child Support Services of the State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joseph Halirou Issa
Defendant:
Department of Human Services Child Support Services of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Souiri v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2017cv00257
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lee Souiri
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Delaware County District Attorney, Maggie McBane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis et al v. Bey et al
as 4:2016cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kayla Dennis , Kelly N Feldhake, Tulsa County District Court and others
Defendant:
Jahlael Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrow v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah L Barrow
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Jonathon Ysbrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gibson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
Travis W Gibson
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County Oklahoma, People of Tulsa County Oklahoma, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
