Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Whitesell v. Nevitt et al
as 4:2018cv00588
Plaintiff:
Laurie Whitesell
Defendant:
Walter Evans, State of Oklahoma and Corey Nevitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. University of Oklahoma Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00404
Defendant:
J Lee, University of Oklahoma Tulsa, Officer Weatherley and others
Plaintiff:
Gaye Lynn Dilek Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Terry Walters
Defendant:
Scott Walton , Jon Sappington , Dan Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walters v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
Wanda T Walters
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, East, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Permaul et al v. Foyil et al
as 4:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Walter Anthony Permaul and Shirley Yadira Permaul
Defendant:
Jonathan Foyil, Tim Hutton, Jerod Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Bennie L Walters, Bennie L Walters and Bennie L Walters
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, East, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Andrews et al v. Holmes et al
as 4:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Andrews, Nancy M Rothschild, Charles D Spencer and others
Defendant:
Jerome A Holmes, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
