Cases 101 - 110 of 2,505
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Blanchard v. Garfield County Courthouse et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blanchard
Defendant:
Garfield County Courthouse, Kartina Matousek Ames, Judge Hladik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weidenfelder v. White
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Sonia R Weidenfelder
Defendant:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elton v Buss
as 4:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
Robert Elton
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luginbyhl v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanwoudenberg v. Harvanek
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Edward John Vanwoudenberg
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
O'Rourke v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Bryan Christopher O'Rourke
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. Tulsa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Marquice Donnell Savage
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Vic Rigilado, Dobbertin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ra'Terrius King
Defendant:
John Tjeerdsma, Jeffery Gatwood, Tulsa County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
