Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 141 - 150 of 2,504
Hopper v. Nix et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Plaintiff: Keith D Hopper
Defendant: Ashley Nix, Tanya Wilson, Loretta Radford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner: Byron Robinson
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sjodin v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff: Kirk Ardell Sjodin, Jr
Defendant: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Wagoner
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff: Bryan Lee Jordan
Defendant: Bethany Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitts v. Regalado
as 4:2023cv00145
Petitioner: Colby Blake Fitts
Respondent: Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Girard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff: Edward Dionta White
Defendant: Officer Girard and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weiler v. USA
as 4:2023cv00175
Petitioner: Gregory A Weiler, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Haas v. Reed
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff: Joseph Keegan Haas
Defendant: Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Parker
as 4:2023cv00079
Petitioner: Maurice L Thompson
Respondent: David Parker and Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff in his Official Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jaquez v. Bowling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00080
Petitioner: Henry Joseph Jaquez
Respondent: Cody Smith, Bret Bowling and Deputy Kalavik
Defendant: Creek County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?