Cases 11 - 20 of 127
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00137
Petitioner:
Brian John Smith
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Walton et al
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Johnny Van Ferrell, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Walton, Turnkey Medical, L.L.C., Jon Sappington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
It v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It, Anthony Nkefiah and Anthony Bryant
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 4:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Grady County Law Enforcement Center, Sergent Nye, Sgt Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston et al v. City of Bartlesville Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Tom Holland, Steven Silver, Bartlesville Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Pouncil and Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leatherman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe, Michael Sizemore and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Leatherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Routt v. Crow
as 4:2021cv00014
Petitioner:
John Stephen Routt
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Claudio v. LNU et al
as 4:2020cv00640
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Vic Regaldo, FNU Wilkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivits v. Johns et al
as 4:2020cv00630
Plaintiff:
Brenda Sivits
Defendant:
Jeffrey Johns, John Hodge, Janet Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
