Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Lemmons v. Grove-Miller et al
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff: Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant: Doug Grove-Miller, Jerry Skidgel, Darrin Varnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Rankin
as 4:2023cv00010
Petitioner: Tracy J McGill
Respondent: William Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Regalado
as 4:2022cv00482
Plaintiff: Jeremy Williams
Defendant: Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00347
Plaintiff: Deana Lunsford and Douglas Rucker
Defendant: City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, Joshua Hyman, Cody Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00248
Petitioner: Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilburn v. Ronkins
as 4:2022cv00240
Petitioner: Ralph Richard Hilburn, II
Respondent: William Ronkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bauders v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00065
Petitioner: William Leon Bauders
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hallum v. Moore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00137
Defendant: Jerry Trout, Ronald Williams, Harlan Moore and others
Plaintiff: Brian Hallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. Martin
as 4:2021cv00073
Respondent: Jimmy Martin
Petitioner: William Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Sharp
as 4:2020cv00380
Respondent: State of Oklahoma and Tommy Sharp
Petitioner: Billy Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?