Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Johnson v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00097
Petitioner: Dexter Leemon Johnson
Defendant: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00342
Petitioner: Ernest Clay Johnson, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff: Dewayne Dudley and Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant: Damon T Hininger, United States Marshals Service, Terrencce Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Louthan
as 4:2022cv00285
Petitioner: Damion L Johnson
Respondent: David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copes v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00226
Petitioner: Shameek Copes
Respondent: Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Parker
as 4:2021cv00384
Petitioner: Marquis Johnson
Respondent: David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Livingston et al v. City of Bartlesville Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Defendant: Tom Holland, Steven Silver, Bartlesville Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Phillip Pouncil and Michael Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stith v. Johnson
as 4:2021cv00171
Petitioner: Chloe Louise Stith
Respondent: Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. Jackson et al
as 4:2020cv00424
Defendant: David B Lee, Michael L Herrington, Leroy Jackson and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herd v. Daniel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00263
Defendant: Anne Daniel, K Johnson, C Murphy and others
Plaintiff: Byron Craig Herd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?