Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,504
Armstrong v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner: Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent: William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cozart v. Tulsa County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: Delmond Cornell Cozart
Defendant: Tulsa County Sheriff Office, Vic Regalado, Detention Officer Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethel v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner: Terrico Bethel
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner: Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Washington v. Holder et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Jermaine T Washington
Defendant: Barret Holder and Ludi Leitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner: Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopper et al v. Weygand et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff: Keith-Dewane Hopper and Deanna-Lyn Dale
Defendant: Jordan Weygand, Robert Glasby, Steven Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colliver v. Pettigrew
as 4:2024cv00198
Petitioner: Erich Dwayne Colliver
Respondent: Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. USA
as 4:2024cv00196
Petitioner: Rodney Joe Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ortner v. USA
as 4:2024cv00195
Petitioner: Carl Gene Ortner, Jr
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?