Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cothran v. Christensen et al
as 4:2011cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tammy Cothran
Defendant:
Joseph Christensen, John Tillman, Daniel Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherryberry, LLC v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
Cherryberry, LLC
Defendant:
Dallas Jones , Cherryberry LLC , Cherry Berry, Springfield, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Deaton et al v. Carr et al
as 4:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Eric Deaton , Natasha Brown , Roger Goforth and others
Defendant:
Elaine Carr , Larry Williams , Marty Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broom v. Springs Global U.S., Inc.
as 4:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Broom and Kathryn Broom
Defendant:
Springs Global U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Warren v. Ebsco Spring Company, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Warren
Defendant:
Ebsco Spring Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. McDaniel et al
as 4:2009cv00195
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dean McDaniel, Leola McDaniel, Bank of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Fannie Mae v. Oklahoma Bay Springs, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2009cv00004
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae and Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Oklahoma Bay Springs, L.L.C., Oklahoma Bay Springs, L.L.C., James S Goody and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
