Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCormick et al v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham and Jennifer Leann McCormick
Defendant:
Oklahoma Bar Association, Christopher Wray, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lynn v. Brown et al
as 4:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Purview Life Tulsa, Theodore Riesling, Phillip Feist and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Ann Lynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brandt et al v. Gray Television Incorporated et al
as 4:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Alesha Brandt , Ted Summers , Scott Tarpley and others
Defendant:
Gray Television Incorporated and WCJB TV20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toone v. Ted's Cafe Escondido Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
Doug Toone
Defendant:
Ted's Cafe Escondido Holdings, Inc. , No Mas, Inc. and TCE V LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kendrick et al v. Allison-Smith Company, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Floyd D Kendrick , Steve Cartright , Kevin F Smith and others
Defendant:
Allison-Smith Company, LLC , Oklahoma Electrical Supply Company , Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Bey v. Ted Parks LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Noble T Hasaan Bey
Defendant:
Ted Parks LLC and Tana Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Ted Parks LLC
as 4:2013cv00181
Defendant:
Ted Parks LLC
Plaintiff:
Noble T Hasaan Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Boland, et al v. Accent Masonry, LLC, et al
as 4:2011mc00016
Plaintiff:
James Boland, John Flynn, Henry Kramer and others
Defendant:
Accent Masonry LLC and Garrett Masonry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
